Top of the Food Chain?

Hi All

Well I was online the other day and found the most interesting pile of shite from some pro-hunt piece of filth about why foxes need to be hunted - they are on the top of their food chain.

What kind of w**ker response is that?  I ask you!  Just because they could be on top of the food chain, then we must kill them?  For what reason?  Um...err...because I am a thick pathetic hunt pervert who gets sexual pleasure in killing animals for fun....Should be the answer really.

Well why is the food chain reason flawed?  Let's have a look!

First of all, foxes are NOT on the top of the food chain, due to the fact that hounds and dogs (domestic) will hunt foxes and kill them.  Even my old best friend used to chase after foxes and rabbits when he could!  Being the grand old age he was, I wasn't too frightened in him catching anything, he lived to the very ripe old age of 19 years old bless 'im and will always be the best friend anyone could ever have, I was the lucky one to have him share my life.

So foxes are not the top, well what now then Darwin?!?!  If you take away human technology, we are pretty crap in the food chain kind of things!  We are not at the very top of the food chain, we would share it with bears and other large preditors.  Also don't forget that polar bears actually hunt humans for food - good on them! So does this make polar bears on top? No not really as they could be hunted by humans also.

So back to an earlier point with the fact that hounds and dogs are on the top of the food chain, do they need to be controlled for being on the top?  Tigers, lions, gorillas and sharks - should we try to wipe these out?  No of course not (although scum has tried on practically all animals sadly), when man was given dominion over the animals of this world by the Allmighty, dominion did not mean to control, exploit, kill and basically be the same are - it meant to look after, to take care of and to be there for and co-exist with.

For the hunted animal and the ban.