David Lee Peters trying to hide behind some 'new' hunting apparel! Also notice the nazi salute from the green coat to the right!
Well once again we see more arrogance from the hunting fraternity but this time from the very same hunt in trouble for racially abusing a hunt saboteur; The Ross Harriers!
Well well well!!! I am not surprised that this kind of scum have done what they did, but to get into the headlines for a second time in such a short period truly astounds me!!!! You would have thought that the hunt would be keeping a VERY LOW profile since the f***ing w** incident, but no! They are far beyond that and once again their release following the recent problem shows their arrogance exudes from them just as much as their evil intent.
Below is a cut and paste from NWHSA blog (http://nwhsa.wordpress.com/):-
Pet cat ran for its life as hounds gave chase
Thursday, 22 November 2012
A hunt has been accused of terrorising a family pet days after its master was convicted of racially harassing a protester.
Dad William Ricks claims Ross Harrier hounds chased daughter Anna’s cat after coming out of the Forest of Dean and onto his land on Saturday.
Five hours later the cat Minna was found cowering 30ft up a tree in the middle of the woods.
He has complained to police and the Forestry Commission about the incident last Saturday.
On Thursday, Harrier’s hunt master David Lee Peters was found guilty of using racially abusive words to a protester sitting in her car.
He was fined £720, and ordered to pay his victim £200 compensation.
He was in charge of the pack when Mr Ricks claims dogs ran into his garden from adjoining Bailey Inclosure.
“The cat legged it into the woods chased by around six or eight baying hounds,” he said.
“It was running for its life. You can imagine how terrifying it must have been for the young cat to be pursued by a pack of hounds in full cry.”
He said the family and several neighbours spent more than five hours looking for Norwegian Forest cat Minna.
“We prepared ourselves for the worse because we thought she might have been ripped to shreds,” he said.
“In the end she was shaken but fine because she could scramble up the tree away from the hounds.”
He reported it to the police and the Forestry Commission.
“Whatever people think about hunting in principle, I feel very strongly that the hunt should be stopped from riding roughshod over local residents and allowing their hounds to enter residential gardens and terrorise domestic animals,” he said.
West Mercia Police confirrmed officers were called to Hope Mansell after a complaint about dogs from a hunt being on the land of local residents.
A spokesman said: “Officers established that no criminal offences had been committed. Words of advice were given to both hunt members and the landowners.”
Nationally, the Forestry Commission allows trail or drag hunting, but not fox hunting on its land.
Only Cotswold Vale Hunt has permits for Lea Bailey two days this season and Deputy Surveyor Kevin Stannard has asked the Harriers for an explanation.
Hunt spokesman Anna Ernsting said: “The Ross Harriers regret that hounds were able to freely access gardens from farm land where we had permission to be. Letters have already been sent to the residents and we will inform them in advance should we be in the area again. We are not the only hunt in the area.”
Now the Cuntryside Alliance must be fuming at this latest news from the Ross Harriers as everything pinned on hunt scum makes them reel back in shock, horror and denial. But the release along with the usual diarrhea they (Ross Harriers) come up with is the thing that surprises me.
Now we all know that hunts have the very tenuous control on their hounds at the best of times - sometimes intentionally. But the 'normal' procedure for someone bringing a pack of hounds which are trained to kill, to an area which results in cats and various other animals being chased and killed, would be to apologise profusely stating that they would not do it again.
But NOT the Ross harriers it seems...............
Hunt spokesman Anna Ernsting said: “The Ross Harriers regret that hounds were able to freely access gardens from farm land where we had permission to be. Letters have already been sent to the residents and we will inform them in advance should we be in the area again. We are not the only hunt in the area.”
So they 'regret' what happened. Which regret would that be? That they trespassed? That they were caught? That they almost killed someone's pet? That if their hounds are likely to riot (as is the case) that they haven't muzzled them yet? The list goes on.
Also the letter states that they have informed the residents when they will be dragging their knuckles back into town - so basically that means "keep your animals locked up because we're here". SHEER ARROGANCE, nothing else.
The last bit also shows their true colours, "we're not the only hunt in the area"! Well you can glean so much form this - "have a go at someone else please"! "If we are likely to chase and kill your pets, then so are our friends"! Or perhaps "we are all alike and do not give a shit about anything so long as we are having our fun"!
The last thing is from the very section of establishment in charge of law and order; the Police. West Mercia police stated:-
A spokesman said: “Officers established that no criminal offences had been committed. Words of advice were given to both hunt members and the landowners.”
So out of control canines (regardless of being hounds or not) do NOT fall into the law regarding dangerous dogs then? It is about time that the police realised that HUNTING WITH HOUNDS WAS OUTLAWED in 2005. The matter has moved on from being an issue of morality or contention. It is a matter of LAW full stop.
The debates for morality were discussed years ago, the will of the majority prevailed and the DUE COURSE of democracy was adhered to and hunting was outlawed. I do not give a shit that there are two sides with this issue - you can say this of every law in the statute books.
A thief does not want to be caught, they want to steal and get away with it. They will argue their case and so will those who fight against them.......
A person committing rape will argue big time about the person they have just raped asking for it and so on. People fighting against this issue will argue that it is wrong and disgusting; two sides of the story.......
Someone guilty of murder will argue that they did what they did for a reason very valid to them. People fighting against this will argue that it is wrong.......
All three examples are illegal (and rightly so) but they are policed very well. Hunting live quarry with hounds is against the law - it is in the statute books and therefore it is the LAW. It's about time that the police stand up and stop being pathetic when faced with angry paedophilic bastards illegally hunting with hounds.
For the hunted animal and the LAW (ban)
